Hope, Optimism, and the Ottomans
I’ve been listening to a deluge of history podcasts recently. I’m trying to get a handle on
what has preceded us – you and me, now, here at the fag end of the pandemic and staring
down the barrel of planetary cataclysm. I’m curious about why empires fall, who started
which war, why was Suleman magnificent, what made Peter great, that sort of thing. I have
learnt about the extraordinary Theodosian Walls around Constantinople: towered double
battlements with moats between which kept out every stripe of medieval besieger from the
5 th century until the city was taken by the Ottomans a thousand years later, led by Mehmed
the Conqueror and his Enormous Gun (I highly recommend reading Anthony Doerr’s Cloud
Cuckoo Land for a far more entertaining way to learn about THAT piece of history). I have
consumed stories about Mongols. Nazis. Crusades. Normans and Normandy. Stalingrad and
Dagestan. Troy. Uganda. Separatists. Insurgents. Abolitionists. Sultans and Mujahadeens.
Slaves.
Perhaps a more accurate motivation for this task, rather than just the ambition of a
fool, is an attempt to understand the conflicts currently burning – some like never-ending
peat fires – around the world. Why Ukraine? What is this invisible, movable line of
murderous hatred between Palestine and Israel? Islam against Islam. China against Taiwan.
Tigray forces in Ethiopia. Uyghurs. It’s exhausting, trying to keep up. So much war. So much
bloodshed of innocents. As Susan Sontag wrote in a New Yorker essay in 2002: War tears,
rends. War rips open, eviscerates. War scorches. War dismembers. War ruins. The why,
however, remains elusive.
It is said that Zeus decreed he would set mankind on a path of eternal warfare so that
humans would never find time to set their eyes upon Olympus, and thus far it has come to
pass. Again, Susan Sontag, in response to a piece written by Virginia Woolf: Who today
believes that war can be abolished? No one, not even the pacifists.
Of course, in our relatively peaceful nation, there are no wars, no skirmishes armed to
claim and reclaim borders. But there are, unarguably, battles. Constant, energy-consuming
conflicts. For example, and stop me if I am droning here, there are rabid anti-trans protests
through the city streets, there is the right-wing push to defeat the enshrinement of The
Voice in Parliament, there is a bloviating billionaire trying to sue the Australian Government
(that is, you and I, and even more so, the downstream dependents on tax-derived money)
for a cool 300 billion dollars. There is a partisan and politicised pandemic response. There
are fossil fuel lobbyists and water diverters and forest levellers. The core of so many of
these struggles is ideology not much different (apart from the weaponry) than all the
conflicts throughout history. Human set against human. Human greed for self-interest.
Groups of privilege prepared to lay waste to other humans and the environment that
sustains them to support even more privilege. It is said that civil wars are fought because
the divisions between humans are stoked to the point that both believe the other side to be
evil, amoral, a danger, sub-human (and, as an aside, how close might the Unites States be to
civil war currently – not far off, some pundits believe).
Every one of these, and a thousand more you could name – from huge conflicts down
to micro-aggressions – all require energy to address and fight. And it’s the way these
conflicts use up our precious energy that keeps me awake at night. Energy diverted from the
critical battle we have ahead of us.
What is my point? I know, despite my advancing years, my shortening telomeres, my
experience on the ground, I remain head-shakingly naïve and unworldly taking up these
positions, these simplistic connections. What am I trying to say – that we should all just be
nicer to each other? Get along and everything will be OK? Perhaps I am simply taking the
opportunity to express my frustration, to share with you, my like-minded compadres, those
of you NoWEMers, you committed warriors for social justice and equality. Frustration, and
occasionally despair, that we must expend that most precious resource of all, our energy, in
fighting pointless battles. But to admit that this is our nature – warlike, greedy, xenophobic
and happy to destroy others in our hunger for power – feels defeatist, and drains the desire
to keep searching for a path to unity when it comes to the climate catastrophe upon us – for
this is finally a battle on which we all need to be on the same side. And, of course, I am
ignoring the breathtaking gains humans have made in areas of justice and equity, both
globally, and in front of our eyes.
Because right about now I will remonstrate with myself. Wallowing in frustration is
also a colossal waste of energy (one might say the same thing of my podcast obsession).
Hope is energy itself, mired firmly in looking forwards after seeing what has been possible in
the past. It is optimism with practical intent.
Few describe the power of hope in dark times better than Rebecca Solnit: Hope is not
a lottery ticket you can sit on the sofa and clutch, feeling lucky. Hope is an axe you break
down doors with in an emergency; because hope should shove you out the door, because it
will take everything you have to steer the future away from endless war, from the
annihilation of the earth’s resources and the grinding down of the poor and marginal. Hope
just means another world might be possible.
To steal from and rearrange Sontag’s words: Hope builds, mends. Hope unites us to
form action within uncertainty. Hope strengthens. Hope is the soil and the seed and the
water. Hope is essential. Hope is a rally cry. Hope is found in both the mightiest of world
movements and in the smallest moments of our shared humanity.
Hope, my dear friends, will keep us, arms linked, shoulders together, as one team,
respectful of all the voices speaking, moving in the same direction, not homogenous but
strengthened by our individuality. Entirely what NoWEM does best. Whatever form it takes,
let no day go by without hope, even if it is as small as a raindrop, as ethereal as morning
mist, as easy as a word. It may be as consequential as history. After all, such things add up.
I’m writing a third novel. This is purely a consequence of me being not quite right in
the head. Talk about event horizon for energy – a supermassive black hole sump of time.
But it is also a leap into the dark. Hope that I can produce something worthwhile for others.
Plus I have been gripped by a theme and it will not let go. Whereas Tiny Uncertain Miracles
explored why we humans believe the things we do, this one is trying to understand how
simultaneously enormous and intimately personal human history is. The opening line is:
Time rumbles. Wish me luck, dearest friends.